Accountancy Age blog: Accountancy Matters with Damian Wild Accountancy Age blog: Accountancy Matters with Damian Wild A blog from Accountancy Age

« January 2007 | Main |March 2007 »

Income tax: a very different debate

In Hong Kong, ACCA member and member of the local parliament Mandy Tam is conducting a survey of the accountancy profession in the territory. It's coming up to Budget time and she wants to know what accountants think about current fiscal measures.

Among the questions she asks is one on income tax, or salaries tax as it's more commonly know locally, which was raised to 16% in the 2003/04 budget. 'Do you think we should reduce both the standard rate for salaries tax and profits tax to 15%?' she asks. Imagine…

Mayflower madness from the Financial Reporting Council

An odd announcement from the Financial Reporting Council yesterday. The FRC is reeling somewhat from the Mayflower case, with embarrassment heaped upon embarrassment in recent weeks.

To recap: The Accountancy Investigation and Discipline Board failed to uphold charges against PricewaterhouseCoopers in its debut case. The firm has gone on the warpath to recover its costs.

The FRC has admitted it has made no provision to cover the costs (a not inconsiderable £1.4m against a £14.9m budget) while expert witness Emile Wolff has come under fire for his interpretation. Now it is engaged in a verbal battle with Woolf's firm, Kingston Smith. Ouch.

'The FRC is disappointed with the decision,' began yesterday's statement.' The FRC continues to support the function of the AIDB, as set out in its Scheme. Where there is evidence of misconduct, as there was in the Mayflower case, it is important that the complaint should be heard by a Disciplinary Tribunal sitting in public.'

It's hard not to argue with that assessment. But then the FRC's interpretation grows decidedly shaky.
'The decision in this case gives rise to potentially significant implications for future disciplinary cases. The FRC is giving careful consideration to the implications of the Tribunal’s decision.'

That is a worrying message. Does it mean:

a) The FRC is going to go cap in hand to government and / or firms and businesses to ask for more money to cover the prospect of possible future losses.

b) The FRC has concerns about the work of the AIDB

c) Regulated firms have nothing to fear as they won't be investigated in future

d) All of the above

India vs. China

A well-known economist suggested to me at the tail end of last year that China might be a little over-sold and that India wasn't getting the attention it deserves. That's no isolated view, of course, but I recall that conversation most days as more and more news about the country's increasing influence in delivering financial services to the UK surfaces.

The latest is that two thirds of NHS accounting and finance functions are to be outsourced, with the majority going to India.

It won't stop there either - with other government departments seemingly considering following suit.

If this trend continues - as it will - expect China to respond. It should be an interesting battle in 2007.

Useful links: About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions | Top of the page
© Incisive Media Ltd. 2008
Incisive Media Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, is a company registered in the United Kingdom with company registration number 04038503